Levels and Activities That Complete the Matrix
of the LEAP Framework
What makes up the LEAP framework?
The LEAP Framework that has been developed offers a profile of
what is involved in being a medical professional.
It identifies three
main strands or areas of practice: clinical expertise, risk
management, and professional values and responsibilities.
These three strands have been further unpacked into a series of
ten components
or domains of professionalism. Identification of these ten areas
is an acknowledgment of the wider range of skills, knowledge and
responsibilities involved in being a medical practitioner today.
Strands and Components
Strands |
Components |
Clinical expertise |
Medical expertise |
|
Clinical judgement |
|
Medical informatics (clinical) |
| |
|
Risk management |
Communication |
|
Practice management |
|
Medical informatics (practice) |
|
Personal management and insight |
| |
|
Professional values and responsibilities |
Relationships and cccountability |
|
Advocacy and equity |
|
Education |
How can these ten domains of professionalism be developed?
The Framework advocates that participation in Continuing Professional
Development (CPD) activities is needed to develop these domains
of professionalism in practitioners. CPD is viewed as the continuous
acquisition and development of knowledge, skills and attitudes to
enable a medical practitioner to constantly improve as a practicing
professional.

Activity Levels
Why are CPD activities broken up into levels?
CPD activities are classified as either a level one, two or three
activity. The three levels reflect a hierarchy of CPD activities,
based on the ability of the activity to effect change in practitioner
behavior and patient outcomes, which is the ultimate aim and purpose
behind undertaking CPD.
- Level One activities are considered to be those
activities that provide the participant with information to improve
their practice. The level of demand on the participant is considered
to be relatively low. Generally, these learning activities tend
to focus on increasing knowledge and skills and include the more
traditional, passive activities such as lectures, conferences,
journal reading and grand rounds.
- Level Two activities are those where there
is a higher demand on the participant. Generally, it is expected
that involvement in these activities will ensure the participant
can demonstrate maintenance of best practice standards and/or
can demonstrate that they have implemented a particular activity
or facilitated changes in practice and health outcomes. Key factors
are collection of data related to a particular question/issue.
Level Two activities include things such as preparation for and
taking part in a practice review or clinical audits, critical
incident monitoring, trying a new approach or technique, participative
workshops, quality control studies and patient satisfaction surveys.
- Level Three activities are those that have
the highest demand on the participant. Generally, these would
involve change evaluating activities where the practitioner evaluates
the impact of an activity or intervention, perhaps resulting from
involvement in a level two activity. An adjustment is made to
address a problem or issue and the effect measured.
Level Three activities include things such as trying out a new
approach/technique and evaluating the outcomes; peer reviews and
audits – implementation of recommendations and evaluation
of the improvements made; completion of a quality cycle where
an action plan has been developed, implemented and evaluated.
In a level three activity it is important that an intervention
or adjustment is made to address a problem and the effect of the
change is measured.
It is possible for activities that a practitioner undertakes from
those listed in Level One, to lead to a Level Two activity, and
then to a Level Three activity. Materials can be provided to guide
those participants who wish to take a Level Two activity and develop
it further, to become a Level Three activity.

Framework Matrix
Matrix
These three levels of activities then complete the matrix
which forms the generic framework upon which medical practitioners
can build their CPD program.
Strands |
Components |
Level
1 |
Level
2 |
Level
3 |
| Clinical
expertise |
Medical
expertise |
|
|
|
| |
Clinical
judgement |
|
|
|
| |
Medical
informatics
(clinical) |
|
|
|
| Risk management |
Communication |
|
|
|
| |
Practice management |
|
|
|
| |
Medical
informatics (practice) |
|
|
|
| |
Personal management & insight |
|
|
|
| Professional
values & responsibilities |
Relationships & cccountability |
|
|
|
| |
Advocacy
& equity |
|
|
|
| |
Education |
|
|
|
What's Expected?
Are participants expected to do activities in all areas of the
matrix?
No.
Participants will be expected to:
- Complete an activity from each of the three strands (any components)
- Complete 10 credits / points in a level 3 activity (any strand,
any component)
- Obtain 50 credits / points in the pilot period, which will
run from October 2004 to 28 October 2005.

Conclusion
Summary
It is not the intention of the framework that all practitioners
should undertake CPD activities in all of the domains of professionalism.
However, by providing a structure and outlining the broader roles
and responsibilities expected today, practitioners are encouraged
to identify their own areas of need and take responsibility for
their own professional development across a range of areas. Different
types of learning activities and different types of learning should
be offered.
It is important that practitioners undertake educational opportunities
at Levels 2 and 3 as these are the ones more likely to bring about
a positive change in patient care and practitioner behaviour.
The information on this page can also be downloaded as a PDF for
printing:
© RANZCOG
|